jump to responses

About This Guide

Welcome to the Better Ballot Georgia 2025 Municipal Voter Guide. As a nonpartisan, nonprofit organization, BBGA is dedicated to educating Georgia citizens on various electoral systems, including Ranked Choice Voting (RCV).

This guide is a vital resource designed to inform you, the voter, on where your local municipal candidates stand on the important issues of runoff elections and ranked choice voting.

This guide shares candidates' own words on whether the runoff system or an alternative like RCV is the best approach for Georgians. Candidates' statements are their own and do not represent the views of Better Ballot Georgia. 

BBGA is committed to creating a thoughtful, productive, public discussion about making elections work the best for everyone. We encourage all candidates to engage with this essential civic topic.

BBGA does not endorse or oppose any candidates.

To learn more about Ranked Choice Voting, go to our information page. 

How to Read This Guide

We sent a simple questionnaire to all candidates running in your municipal election this November.

In the responses below, you will find the candidates' exact, unedited answers to six key questions about runoffs, Ranked Choice Voting, and how much choice local governments should have in setting their own election rules. Scroll or search the page for your city and/or district to see what your candidates may have to say about runoffs and RCV.

Use this information to decide who you think has the best ideas for making our local democracy work well.

The Candidate Questionnaire

  1. Are you familiar with Ranked Choice Voting, and if so what are your thoughts on that system?
  2. Do you think it’s important that the winner of an election receives a majority (>50%) of the votes?
  3. Given that runoffs typically see a substantial dropoff in turnout and cost additional taxpayer money to run, do you think runoffs are the best way to ensure majority winners, or do you think Ranked Choice Voting is a better alternative to achieve that same outcome?
  4. In your experience, what are the main challenges your city faces in conducting elections, particularly regarding runoffs?
  5. Do you believe local jurisdictions should have more flexibility to choose their voting methods, or should the state maintain uniform standards? What are your reasons?
  6. Do you think Ranked Choice Voting might be a good option for your community?

Prepare to Vote

Find your polling locations and check your registration by clicking here.

 

Candidate Responses

Supports RCV
Undecided
Opposes RCV
RCV sentiment District Name
Perry Mayor Christopher Smith ▼
Christopher Smith
  1. Are you familiar with Ranked Choice Voting, and if so what are your thoughts on that system?
    Im not familiar
  2. Do you think it’s important that the winner of an election receives a majority (>50%) of the votes?
    Yes, in a head to head race.
  3. Given that runoffs typically see a substantial dropoff in turnout and cost additional taxpayer money to run, do you think runoffs are the best way to ensure majority winners, or do you think Ranked Choice Voting is a better alternative to achieve that same outcome?
    I have no answer for that at the moment
  4. In your experience, what are the main challenges your city faces in conducting elections, particularly regarding runoffs?
    People being unaware of a race during a non presidential race year
  5. Do you believe local jurisdictions should have more flexibility to choose their voting methods, or should the state maintain uniform standards? What are your reasons?
    Uniform standards so methods cannot be altered to give certain people an advantage.
  6. Do you think Ranked Choice Voting might be a good option for your community?
    Im unaware of it.
Douglasville Council Member, Ward 3, Post 1 Tyrone Barmore ▼
Tyrone Barmore
  1. Are you familiar with Ranked Choice Voting, and if so what are your thoughts on that system?
    Great idea to eliminate the return trip to the polls.
  2. Do you think it’s important that the winner of an election receives a majority (>50%) of the votes?
    Not at all if we got to RCV.
  3. Given that runoffs typically see a substantial dropoff in turnout and cost additional taxpayer money to run, do you think runoffs are the best way to ensure majority winners, or do you think Ranked Choice Voting is a better alternative to achieve that same outcome?
    RCV is a better alternative.
  4. In your experience, what are the main challenges your city faces in conducting elections, particularly regarding runoffs?
    Overall register voter not performing their civic duties.
  5. Do you believe local jurisdictions should have more flexibility to choose their voting methods, or should the state maintain uniform standards? What are your reasons?
    Actually, I'd prefer a Federal Standard across all 50 states to include Puerto Rico & Guam
  6. Do you think Ranked Choice Voting might be a good option for your community?
    Yes
Atlanta City Council, District 11 Wayne Martin ▼
Wayne Martin
  1. Are you familiar with Ranked Choice Voting, and if so what are your thoughts on that system?
    Yes. Ranked choice voting allows voters to make choices between multiple candidates, by ranking them in order of support to make elections outcomes more efficient and do away with runoffs.
  2. Do you think it’s important that the winner of an election receives a majority (>50%) of the votes?
    Yes, because the >50% margin demonstrates a clear majority
  3. Given that runoffs typically see a substantial dropoff in turnout and cost additional taxpayer money to run, do you think runoffs are the best way to ensure majority winners, or do you think Ranked Choice Voting is a better alternative to achieve that same outcome?
    I think ranked choice voting is a better alternative and could allow for achieving the same outcome of a runoff
  4. In your experience, what are the main challenges your city faces in conducting elections, particularly regarding runoffs?
    Low turnout due to voter fatigue and lack of awareness
  5. Do you believe local jurisdictions should have more flexibility to choose their voting methods, or should the state maintain uniform standards? What are your reasons?
    I believe voting methods should be uniform across the state
  6. Do you think Ranked Choice Voting might be a good option for your community?
    Yes
Milledgeville Mayor Walter Reynolds ▼
Walter Reynolds
  1. Are you familiar with Ranked Choice Voting, and if so what are your thoughts on that system?
    Yes! I am a strong advocate for RCV.
  2. Do you think it’s important that the winner of an election receives a majority (>50%) of the votes?
    Yes, and RCV can provide a clear pathway for election outcomes to achieve a 50% +1 result.
  3. Given that runoffs typically see a substantial dropoff in turnout and cost additional taxpayer money to run, do you think runoffs are the best way to ensure majority winners, or do you think Ranked Choice Voting is a better alternative to achieve that same outcome?
    RCV is the superior option.
  4. In your experience, what are the main challenges your city faces in conducting elections, particularly regarding runoffs?
    Voter Turnout for Runoffs.
  5. Do you believe local jurisdictions should have more flexibility to choose their voting methods, or should the state maintain uniform standards? What are your reasons?
    Municipalities should absolutely have the option for RCV and Counties should not be pigeonholed by the state to use First Past The Post.
  6. Do you think Ranked Choice Voting might be a good option for your community?
    Yes.
Dunwoody Post 1 Catherine Lautenbacher ▼
Catherine Lautenbacher
  1. Are you familiar with Ranked Choice Voting, and if so what are your thoughts on that system?
    Yes, I think this is a great system
  2. Do you think it’s important that the winner of an election receives a majority (>50%) of the votes?
    I think that 50% offers a mandate. If my second choice was moved to my first due to lack of support for my first, I would consider that my first for the 50%.
  3. Given that runoffs typically see a substantial dropoff in turnout and cost additional taxpayer money to run, do you think runoffs are the best way to ensure majority winners, or do you think Ranked Choice Voting is a better alternative to achieve that same outcome?
    I think RCV provides a better outcome. I am asked at that time of voting to rank my choices. Then I understand how my vote factored in to the winner. Currently I feel like I vote all the time!
  4. In your experience, what are the main challenges your city faces in conducting elections, particularly regarding runoffs?
    Turnout! Always the challenge with
  5. Do you believe local jurisdictions should have more flexibility to choose their voting methods, or should the state maintain uniform standards? What are your reasons?
    With all the uproar about voting, I think we should be uniform in the state
  6. Do you think Ranked Choice Voting might be a good option for your community?
    Yes!
Woodstock City Council, Ward 1 Trent Council ▼
Trent Council
  1. Are you familiar with Ranked Choice Voting, and if so what are your thoughts on that system?
    I strongly approve of Ranked Choice voting and believe it should be instituted nationwide.
  2. Do you think it’s important that the winner of an election receives a majority (>50%) of the votes?
    Absolutely
  3. Given that runoffs typically see a substantial dropoff in turnout and cost additional taxpayer money to run, do you think runoffs are the best way to ensure majority winners, or do you think Ranked Choice Voting is a better alternative to achieve that same outcome?
    Ranked Choice is a much better option
  4. In your experience, what are the main challenges your city faces in conducting elections, particularly regarding runoffs?
    There isn’t enough choice in general, requiring you to compromise your beliefs.
  5. Do you believe local jurisdictions should have more flexibility to choose their voting methods, or should the state maintain uniform standards? What are your reasons?
    Local elections should have flexibility
  6. Do you think Ranked Choice Voting might be a good option for your community?
    Yes.
Stockbridge City Council District 1 Marion D. Calhoun ▼
Marion D. Calhoun
  1. Are you familiar with Ranked Choice Voting, and if so what are your thoughts on that system?
    Yes
  2. Do you think it’s important that the winner of an election receives a majority (>50%) of the votes?
    Yes
  3. Given that runoffs typically see a substantial dropoff in turnout and cost additional taxpayer money to run, do you think runoffs are the best way to ensure majority winners, or do you think Ranked Choice Voting is a better alternative to achieve that same outcome?
    I like run off
  4. In your experience, what are the main challenges your city faces in conducting elections, particularly regarding runoffs?
    There should be 60 days between election and run off not 30 days
  5. Do you believe local jurisdictions should have more flexibility to choose their voting methods, or should the state maintain uniform standards? What are your reasons?
    All elections should be uniform
  6. Do you think Ranked Choice Voting might be a good option for your community?
    No
Flowery Branch Mayor Oliver McClellan ▼
Oliver McClellan
  1. Are you familiar with Ranked Choice Voting, and if so what are your thoughts on that system?
    Yes
  2. Do you think it’s important that the winner of an election receives a majority (>50%) of the votes?
    Yes
  3. Given that runoffs typically see a substantial dropoff in turnout and cost additional taxpayer money to run, do you think runoffs are the best way to ensure majority winners, or do you think Ranked Choice Voting is a better alternative to achieve that same outcome?
    Ranked Choice is the best way
  4. In your experience, what are the main challenges your city faces in conducting elections, particularly regarding runoffs?
    Uneducated or uncaring voters.
  5. Do you believe local jurisdictions should have more flexibility to choose their voting methods, or should the state maintain uniform standards? What are your reasons?
    I think there should be a single standard for the state. A mishmash of voting standards would be a nightmare.
  6. Do you think Ranked Choice Voting might be a good option for your community?
    Yes
Atlanta City Council, District 9 Dustin Hillis ▼
Dustin Hillis
  1. Are you familiar with Ranked Choice Voting, and if so what are your thoughts on that system?
    Yes, I’m familiar with Ranked Choice Voting, and I think it’s a promising system because it gives voters more choice in a single election without the need for costly, time-consuming runoffs. By letting people rank candidates in order of preference, it helps ensure that the winner has majority support.
  2. Do you think it’s important that the winner of an election receives a majority (>50%) of the votes?
    Yes and no. If you mean in the context of traditional voting systems, then yes. However, in Ranked Choice Voting, even though the first round may not produce a majority winner, the voters' subsequent ranked choices made in simulated voting rounds will still guarantee a majority winner at conclusion.
  3. Given that runoffs typically see a substantial dropoff in turnout and cost additional taxpayer money to run, do you think runoffs are the best way to ensure majority winners, or do you think Ranked Choice Voting is a better alternative to achieve that same outcome?
    I do not think runoffs are economical and also sometimes do not produce the best winner due to lower turnout. Ranked choice voting would eliminate these concerns.
  4. In your experience, what are the main challenges your city faces in conducting elections, particularly regarding runoffs?
    Our City experiences runoffs almost every election, and recently, even in special elections that are already costly themselves. The biggest concern for the City is the cost of conducting an election, sometimes only for one seat, which is well over $1M. Additionally as mentioned above, runoffs usually see less turnout, which may not always produce the best, most qualified candidate.
  5. Do you believe local jurisdictions should have more flexibility to choose their voting methods, or should the state maintain uniform standards? What are your reasons?
    For their local elections, such as county commission, mayor, city council, and school board, I believe cities and counties should be able to set their own voting system. This would also serve as "test runs" for the state, showing them how effective and efficient a ranked choice voting system could be.
  6. Do you think Ranked Choice Voting might be a good option for your community?
    Yes.
Chamblee, At-Large Will Thomason ▼
Will Thomason
  1. Are you familiar with Ranked Choice Voting, and if so what are your thoughts on that system?
    Yes, love it.
  2. Do you think it’s important that the winner of an election receives a majority (>50%) of the votes?
    Yes, but I believe ranked choice considers that until you do get a 50%+ candidate.
  3. Given that runoffs typically see a substantial dropoff in turnout and cost additional taxpayer money to run, do you think runoffs are the best way to ensure majority winners, or do you think Ranked Choice Voting is a better alternative to achieve that same outcome?
    Ranked choice is better
  4. In your experience, what are the main challenges your city faces in conducting elections, particularly regarding runoffs?
    I am not a fan of how everyone votes for each districts representative, i think it should be limited to only the district you live in.
  5. Do you believe local jurisdictions should have more flexibility to choose their voting methods, or should the state maintain uniform standards? What are your reasons?
    For local elections, sure. For state elections, probably should be standardized across the state.
  6. Do you think Ranked Choice Voting might be a good option for your community?
    yes
Roswell City Council, Post 6 Nick Porche ▼
Nick Porche
  1. Are you familiar with Ranked Choice Voting, and if so what are your thoughts on that system?
    I am familiar. I think it is a good idea and can save money and eliminate runoffs. My fear is that it may be confusing especially for those who do not regularly vote.
  2. Do you think it’s important that the winner of an election receives a majority (>50%) of the votes?
    Yes
  3. Given that runoffs typically see a substantial dropoff in turnout and cost additional taxpayer money to run, do you think runoffs are the best way to ensure majority winners, or do you think Ranked Choice Voting is a better alternative to achieve that same outcome?
    Compared to a runoff, I do think Ranked Choice Voting is better. Saves money and time and you get the person in the moment, without making them vote again.
  4. In your experience, what are the main challenges your city faces in conducting elections, particularly regarding runoffs?
    Getting people to the polls.
  5. Do you believe local jurisdictions should have more flexibility to choose their voting methods, or should the state maintain uniform standards? What are your reasons?
    I do think more flexibility should be allowed. As mentioned, municipal elections already have a low turnout so more options are good.
  6. Do you think Ranked Choice Voting might be a good option for your community?
    I think so - especially in cases with more than 2 candidates in a race to eliminate runoffs.
Sandy Springs Council District 4 Steven Hickey ▼
Steven Hickey
  1. Are you familiar with Ranked Choice Voting, and if so what are your thoughts on that system?
    I think it is a more effective way of managing an election process; however, it would require a deeper engagement and preparation of the voter on election day. The RCV remains unproven to be more effective at this point in time.
  2. Do you think it’s important that the winner of an election receives a majority (>50%) of the votes?
    No. If it is not required for a large, well funded election like a federal Presidential election, then it should not be a requirement for smaller, municipal elections.
  3. Given that runoffs typically see a substantial dropoff in turnout and cost additional taxpayer money to run, do you think runoffs are the best way to ensure majority winners, or do you think Ranked Choice Voting is a better alternative to achieve that same outcome?
    No, I do not. It does not provide any additional comfort that the best candidate will win.
  4. In your experience, what are the main challenges your city faces in conducting elections, particularly regarding runoffs?
    Voter engagement would be the primary concern. Municipal elections will typically run on the coat tails of larger state and federal elections. If 60% of citizens participate in large federal elections, then it drops significantly for smaller non-federal elections, and is barely noticable on the run offs. There are huge dropoffs in participation.
  5. Do you believe local jurisdictions should have more flexibility to choose their voting methods, or should the state maintain uniform standards? What are your reasons?
    This is a great question. Local municipalities may pursue good intentions if they were allowed to structure their own system of voting, but there are always weaknesses with any approach. Special interests can get involved and exploit and steer these elections. We have just seen it occur in the past 4 years. Incumbent officials may be able to influence the participation and outcomes. Accordingly, I do believe in upholding state wide standards for all municipal elections.
  6. Do you think Ranked Choice Voting might be a good option for your community?
    Yes.
Kennesaw Post 3 Donovan Giardina ▼
Donovan Giardina
  1. Are you familiar with Ranked Choice Voting, and if so what are your thoughts on that system?
    I am a strong believer in ranked choice voting. The method of voting in Kennesaw does not well serve the voters as it protects candidates that might not be popular with the voters of Kennesaw.
  2. Do you think it’s important that the winner of an election receives a majority (>50%) of the votes?
    Not necessarily. If there are many candidates that are running for the same office, 50% of the vote might not be possible. In races where there are only two candidates, yes, that should be a requirement.
  3. Given that runoffs typically see a substantial dropoff in turnout and cost additional taxpayer money to run, do you think runoffs are the best way to ensure majority winners, or do you think Ranked Choice Voting is a better alternative to achieve that same outcome?
    Ranked Choice is far and away a more efficient method as it can be implemented on the front end and does not require additional funds. Holding what is essentially an additional election for a run-off contributes to voter fatigue and puts a financial strain on resources.
  4. In your experience, what are the main challenges your city faces in conducting elections, particularly regarding runoffs?
    I am not aware of any runoffs that have taken place, but low voter turnout and additional financial outlays would be a problem.
  5. Do you believe local jurisdictions should have more flexibility to choose their voting methods, or should the state maintain uniform standards? What are your reasons?
    While local jurisdictions should have some decision making power in their own elections, it is important that the state establish uniform rules. Without a uniform set of rules at the state level, there could be added layers of voter confusion and grounds for contesting election results that could otherwise be avoided.
  6. Do you think Ranked Choice Voting might be a good option for your community?
    Definitely. As it currently stands, Kennesaw City Council seats serve at large, but you still have to declare which post you are running for. This enables candidates that might not have widespread community support to maintain their seats merely because no one chose to run in their specific race.
Acworth Aldermen Post 4 -At Large Kimberly Haase ▼
Kimberly Haase
  1. Are you familiar with Ranked Choice Voting, and if so what are your thoughts on that system?
    Yes, it's a system that would help reduce career politicians
  2. Do you think it’s important that the winner of an election receives a majority (>50%) of the votes?
    Yes
  3. Given that runoffs typically see a substantial dropoff in turnout and cost additional taxpayer money to run, do you think runoffs are the best way to ensure majority winners, or do you think Ranked Choice Voting is a better alternative to achieve that same outcome?
    Yes, I believe we should look at redesigning the run off election system
  4. In your experience, what are the main challenges your city faces in conducting elections, particularly regarding runoffs?
    We don't have enough people to run for municipal election to have challengers
  5. Do you believe local jurisdictions should have more flexibility to choose their voting methods, or should the state maintain uniform standards? What are your reasons?
    I believe the state should maintain uniform standards. I believe corruption can easily ease it's way into local government especially those small towns or rural communities.
  6. Do you think Ranked Choice Voting might be a good option for your community?
    Yes
Atlanta Mayor Helmut Lucero-Domagalski Love ▼
Helmut Lucero-Domagalski Love
  1. Are you familiar with Ranked Choice Voting, and if so what are your thoughts on that system?
    Yes, I generally like the concept, but have concern that the actual winner may not win. I also think it becomes more taxing on voters
  2. Do you think it’s important that the winner of an election receives a majority (>50%) of the votes?
    I don't, personally, I would rather us introduce a 3rd party over RCV. RCV is a good interum tactic and I like that it eliminates the impact of spoiler candidates
  3. Given that runoffs typically see a substantial dropoff in turnout and cost additional taxpayer money to run, do you think runoffs are the best way to ensure majority winners, or do you think Ranked Choice Voting is a better alternative to achieve that same outcome?
    I like RCV better frankly. However, I will say, there is cost involved in a run off, but also more focus that is finally given to a race that it might not recieve without one.
  4. In your experience, what are the main challenges your city faces in conducting elections, particularly regarding runoffs?
    I think our biggest issue is corruption in the voter roles in Fulton County and the State.
  5. Do you believe local jurisdictions should have more flexibility to choose their voting methods, or should the state maintain uniform standards? What are your reasons?
    I believe the State should be the authority so that there is uniformity in thought throughout the State.
  6. Do you think Ranked Choice Voting might be a good option for your community?
    I do, but it is not priority over cleaning up voter registrartion
Atlanta City Council Post 1 At-Large Matt Rinker ▼
Matt Rinker
  1. Are you familiar with Ranked Choice Voting, and if so what are your thoughts on that system?
    I am familiar with Ranked Choice Voting, and I believe it offers real benefits to voters and to our democracy. By allowing people to rank candidates in order of preference, RCV ensures that the winner has broader support and that voters don’t feel pressured to choose between “the lesser of two evils.” It reduces the spoiler effect, eliminates the need for costly and low-turnout runoffs, and encourages candidates to reach beyond their base to build consensus across communities.
  2. Do you think it’s important that the winner of an election receives a majority (>50%) of the votes?
    Yes. When elected officials win with only a small share of the vote, it can leave communities divided and weaken trust in our democratic process. A system that ensures winners have majority support gives them a stronger mandate to lead and helps voters feel their voices were heard. Ranked Choice Voting is one of the best tools to achieve this because it allows voters to rank their preferences while guaranteeing that the final winner has true majority backing without the need for expensive, low-turnout runoffs.
  3. Given that runoffs typically see a substantial dropoff in turnout and cost additional taxpayer money to run, do you think runoffs are the best way to ensure majority winners, or do you think Ranked Choice Voting is a better alternative to achieve that same outcome?
    Ranked Choice Voting is a better solution. It delivers a majority winner in one election, saving money and ensuring higher participation. It also encourages candidates to build broader coalitions and speak to more voters, not just a narrow base. I believe Georgia should move toward Ranked Choice Voting as a more democratic, cost-effective, and voter-friendly alternative to runoffs.
  4. In your experience, what are the main challenges your city faces in conducting elections, particularly regarding runoffs?
    The biggest challenge is turnout - specifically in municipal and special elections. When a runoff is required, turnout drops dramatically. Run-off elections have such a small fragment of the voting population the true will of the people often gets lost.
  5. Do you believe local jurisdictions should have more flexibility to choose their voting methods, or should the state maintain uniform standards? What are your reasons?
    I think for local elections, jurisdictions should have the authority to run their election how it sees fit. For state elections, the state can put parameters.
  6. Do you think Ranked Choice Voting might be a good option for your community?
    Yes. Atlanta has seen firsthand how costly and draining runoffs can be, with turnout falling sharply in the second round. Ranked Choice Voting would allow us to elect leaders with true majority support in a single election, saving taxpayers money and ensuring more voices are heard. It also encourages candidates to reach across communities to build broader coalitions, which is exactly what Atlanta needs to move forward together.
Monroe Council District 8 David Dickinson ▼
David Dickinson
  1. Are you familiar with Ranked Choice Voting, and if so what are your thoughts on that system?
    Yes. I think it is a good idea
  2. Do you think it’s important that the winner of an election receives a majority (>50%) of the votes?
    Yes
  3. Given that runoffs typically see a substantial dropoff in turnout and cost additional taxpayer money to run, do you think runoffs are the best way to ensure majority winners, or do you think Ranked Choice Voting is a better alternative to achieve that same outcome?
    RCV is a better option due to the expense of runoff elections
  4. In your experience, what are the main challenges your city faces in conducting elections, particularly regarding runoffs?
    Low turnout
  5. Do you believe local jurisdictions should have more flexibility to choose their voting methods, or should the state maintain uniform standards? What are your reasons?
    I believe in local control
  6. Do you think Ranked Choice Voting might be a good option for your community?
    Yes
Cartersville City Council Ward 5 Thomas Jolliff ▼
Thomas Jolliff
  1. Are you familiar with Ranked Choice Voting, and if so what are your thoughts on that system?
    Yes and I'm not for it.
  2. Do you think it’s important that the winner of an election receives a majority (>50%) of the votes?
    Yes
  3. Given that runoffs typically see a substantial dropoff in turnout and cost additional taxpayer money to run, do you think runoffs are the best way to ensure majority winners, or do you think Ranked Choice Voting is a better alternative to achieve that same outcome?
    I absolutely do believe runoffs are the best way.
  4. In your experience, what are the main challenges your city faces in conducting elections, particularly regarding runoffs?
    Voter turnout.
  5. Do you believe local jurisdictions should have more flexibility to choose their voting methods, or should the state maintain uniform standards? What are your reasons?
    I believe the people should have the say regarding voting methods as long as those methods do not restrict legal age citizen from being able to vote.
  6. Do you think Ranked Choice Voting might be a good option for your community?
    No
LaGrange Mayor Dr Israel barsh ▼
Dr Israel barsh
  1. Are you familiar with Ranked Choice Voting, and if so what are your thoughts on that system?
    It should be used.
  2. Do you think it’s important that the winner of an election receives a majority (>50%) of the votes?
    Yes
  3. Given that runoffs typically see a substantial dropoff in turnout and cost additional taxpayer money to run, do you think runoffs are the best way to ensure majority winners, or do you think Ranked Choice Voting is a better alternative to achieve that same outcome?
    Ranked Choice Voting is the better alternative
  4. In your experience, what are the main challenges your city faces in conducting elections, particularly regarding runoffs?
    Increasing election precinct's accountability
  5. Do you believe local jurisdictions should have more flexibility to choose their voting methods, or should the state maintain uniform standards? What are your reasons?
    State Standards, but with major checks and balances built in
  6. Do you think Ranked Choice Voting might be a good option for your community?
    No
McDonough City Council At-Large Montina Young Fraiser ▼
Montina Young Fraiser
  1. Are you familiar with Ranked Choice Voting, and if so what are your thoughts on that system?
    No
  2. Do you think it’s important that the winner of an election receives a majority (>50%) of the votes?
    Yes
  3. Given that runoffs typically see a substantial dropoff in turnout and cost additional taxpayer money to run, do you think runoffs are the best way to ensure majority winners, or do you think Ranked Choice Voting is a better alternative to achieve that same outcome?
    I think Ranked Choice Voting is a better alternative to achieve that same outcome.
  4. In your experience, what are the main challenges your city faces in conducting elections, particularly regarding runoffs?
    My city does not have run-offs. We are a plurality city.
  5. Do you believe local jurisdictions should have more flexibility to choose their voting methods, or should the state maintain uniform standards? What are your reasons?
    Yes, more flexibility! Out of 37,000 registered voters we had 4,435 show up to the last local election and our Mayor was voted in with 1,338 votes.
  6. Do you think Ranked Choice Voting might be a good option for your community?
    No because we don't have run-offs. Thank you.
Stockbridge City Council District 2 Willie Carter ▼
Willie Carter
  1. Are you familiar with Ranked Choice Voting, and if so what are your thoughts on that system?
    Seems like a efficient system for the most part. But needs more data to substantiate it’s purpose.
  2. Do you think it’s important that the winner of an election receives a majority (>50%) of the votes?
    Yes
  3. Given that runoffs typically see a substantial dropoff in turnout and cost additional taxpayer money to run, do you think runoffs are the best way to ensure majority winners, or do you think Ranked Choice Voting is a better alternative to achieve that same outcome?
    It can be used as an alternative. But needs more time or data substantiate its effectiveness.
  4. In your experience, what are the main challenges your city faces in conducting elections, particularly regarding runoffs?
    Voters participating due to degenerative conditions.
  5. Do you believe local jurisdictions should have more flexibility to choose their voting methods, or should the state maintain uniform standards? What are your reasons?
    Local jurisdictions should have more say so for its own elections.
  6. Do you think Ranked Choice Voting might be a good option for your community?
    It can be used as an alternative until more data is collected to substantiate its efficacy.
Brunswick Mayor Vincent Williams ▼
Vincent Williams
  1. Are you familiar with Ranked Choice Voting, and if so what are your thoughts on that system?
    No, I'm not familiar
  2. Do you think it’s important that the winner of an election receives a majority (>50%) of the votes?
    Yes
  3. Given that runoffs typically see a substantial dropoff in turnout and cost additional taxpayer money to run, do you think runoffs are the best way to ensure majority winners, or do you think Ranked Choice Voting is a better alternative to achieve that same outcome?
    No
  4. In your experience, what are the main challenges your city faces in conducting elections, particularly regarding runoffs?
    Getting the voters to return for run off elections
  5. Do you believe local jurisdictions should have more flexibility to choose their voting methods, or should the state maintain uniform standards? What are your reasons?
    I think that the state should maintain uniform standards, to keep local elections fair and aboveground
  6. Do you think Ranked Choice Voting might be a good option for your community?
    Not sure,
Dunwoody City Council District 2, Post 2 Rob Price ▼
Rob Price
  1. Are you familiar with Ranked Choice Voting, and if so what are your thoughts on that system?
    Yes. It seems like a reasonable method to boost overall voter participation by limiting the need for runoff elections and to eliminate the potential cost of those runoffs.
  2. Do you think it’s important that the winner of an election receives a majority (>50%) of the votes?
    Yes. To me it is important that the winner represent the choice of the majority of the participating voters.
  3. Given that runoffs typically see a substantial dropoff in turnout and cost additional taxpayer money to run, do you think runoffs are the best way to ensure majority winners, or do you think Ranked Choice Voting is a better alternative to achieve that same outcome?
    I think ranked choice voting presents a strong argument that the outcome of that process helps represent the will of a larger portion of the electorate - especially for smaller races where initial voter participation may already be low.
  4. In your experience, what are the main challenges your city faces in conducting elections, particularly regarding runoffs?
    Elections are conducted by the county, not the city. This currently gives us limited control over the process.
  5. Do you believe local jurisdictions should have more flexibility to choose their voting methods, or should the state maintain uniform standards? What are your reasons?
    In general I'm in favor of local control. However, given that there are often state and local issues on the same ballot, a uniform state-wide voting system would seem to be less confusing and easier to implement.
  6. Do you think Ranked Choice Voting might be a good option for your community?
    Yes. Municipal elections tend to have low turnout. A runoff would likely have fewer voters. Ranked choice would probably better reflect the will of a larger portion of the electorate.
Union City - At Large - City Council Lawanna Owens-Twaites ▼
Lawanna Owens-Twaites
  1. Are you familiar with Ranked Choice Voting, and if so what are your thoughts on that system?
    Yes
  2. Do you think it’s important that the winner of an election receives a majority (>50%) of the votes?
    Yes
  3. Given that runoffs typically see a substantial dropoff in turnout and cost additional taxpayer money to run, do you think runoffs are the best way to ensure majority winners, or do you think Ranked Choice Voting is a better alternative to achieve that same outcome?
    Ranked Choice Voting is a better alternative
  4. In your experience, what are the main challenges your city faces in conducting elections, particularly regarding runoffs?
    Voter turnout
  5. Do you believe local jurisdictions should have more flexibility to choose their voting methods, or should the state maintain uniform standards? What are your reasons?
    Uniform standards
  6. Do you think Ranked Choice Voting might be a good option for your community?
    Yes
Marietta Mayor Sam Foster ▼
Sam Foster
  1. Are you familiar with Ranked Choice Voting, and if so what are your thoughts on that system?
    I believe Ranked Choice Voting is a more efficient system that can increase voter participation and strengthen trust in our elections.
  2. Do you think it’s important that the winner of an election receives a majority (>50%) of the votes?
    Yes. Having a clear winner with a majority builds confidence that elections are free and fair. It also gives the winner a stronger mandate to govern. I support measures that increase voter turnout so more residents have a voice in the outcome.
  3. Given that runoffs typically see a substantial dropoff in turnout and cost additional taxpayer money to run, do you think runoffs are the best way to ensure majority winners, or do you think Ranked Choice Voting is a better alternative to achieve that same outcome?
    Ranked Choice Voting is a better alternative. Runoffs lead to lower participation and are expensive for the city to administer. Ranked Choice Voting achieves majority winners in one election and saves money.
  4. In your experience, what are the main challenges your city faces in conducting elections, particularly regarding runoffs?
    Marietta already struggles with low turnout in municipal elections. Runoffs make that problem worse, with even fewer voters returning to the polls. On top of that, the city has to pay the county for the extra cost of runoffs. We should look for ways to be fiscally responsible while ensuring access for voters.
  5. Do you believe local jurisdictions should have more flexibility to choose their voting methods, or should the state maintain uniform standards? What are your reasons?
    Local jurisdictions like Marietta should have the flexibility to choose. We are the ones paying for elections, and introducing Ranked Choice Voting in municipalities would help voters get familiar with the system and see its benefits. I support legislation that allows cities to have more control over their voting methods.
  6. Do you think Ranked Choice Voting might be a good option for your community?
    Yes. Marietta has low turnout in some wards and higher turnout in others. Ranked Choice Voting would make our elections more efficient and ensure that winners have broad support.
Tucker Mayor Beverly Williams ▼
Beverly Williams
  1. Are you familiar with Ranked Choice Voting, and if so what are your thoughts on that system?
    I appreciate the explanation and execution process that comes with RCV.
  2. Do you think it’s important that the winner of an election receives a majority (>50%) of the votes?
    Yes
  3. Given that runoffs typically see a substantial dropoff in turnout and cost additional taxpayer money to run, do you think runoffs are the best way to ensure majority winners, or do you think Ranked Choice Voting is a better alternative to achieve that same outcome?
    Ranked Choice Voting is the better alternative
  4. In your experience, what are the main challenges your city faces in conducting elections, particularly regarding runoffs?
    We have working class citizens and we should not take up their time with additional elections
  5. Do you believe local jurisdictions should have more flexibility to choose their voting methods, or should the state maintain uniform standards? What are your reasons?
    Uniform Standards. Structure is foundation of Life.
  6. Do you think Ranked Choice Voting might be a good option for your community?
    Yes
Griffin City Commissioner, District 5 Zachery Fuller ▼
Zachery Fuller
  1. Are you familiar with Ranked Choice Voting, and if so what are your thoughts on that system?
    I love ranked choice voting and wish it was standard across the country.
  2. Do you think it’s important that the winner of an election receives a majority (>50%) of the votes?
    Yes, voters should come to a consensus on their elected officials which is another reason why I support ranked choice voting.
  3. Given that runoffs typically see a substantial dropoff in turnout and cost additional taxpayer money to run, do you think runoffs are the best way to ensure majority winners, or do you think Ranked Choice Voting is a better alternative to achieve that same outcome?
    The runoff system is rooted in historic racism. I am whole-heartedly against that system, but for a ranked choice system.
  4. In your experience, what are the main challenges your city faces in conducting elections, particularly regarding runoffs?
    We lack the funding needed to properly run elections, especially with runoffs. HB769, which passed in 2021, makes running elections in Spalding County even more difficult because of it's residency requirement.
  5. Do you believe local jurisdictions should have more flexibility to choose their voting methods, or should the state maintain uniform standards? What are your reasons?
    I think it should be up to the people. So, if a local area wants to try something new to improve their elections, unless it makes voting more difficult, then it should be embraced.
  6. Do you think Ranked Choice Voting might be a good option for your community?
    Yes, absolutely.
Winterville City Council Dianne Greene ▼
Dianne Greene
  1. Are you familiar with Ranked Choice Voting, and if so what are your thoughts on that system?
    Yes, I think this a great alternative
  2. Do you think it’s important that the winner of an election receives a majority (>50%) of the votes?
    Yes
  3. Given that runoffs typically see a substantial dropoff in turnout and cost additional taxpayer money to run, do you think runoffs are the best way to ensure majority winners, or do you think Ranked Choice Voting is a better alternative to achieve that same outcome?
    Ranked Choice Voting is the better option
  4. In your experience, what are the main challenges your city faces in conducting elections, particularly regarding runoffs?
    I think they should come up with a better way to do runoffs
  5. Do you believe local jurisdictions should have more flexibility to choose their voting methods, or should the state maintain uniform standards? What are your reasons?
    Local jurisdictions should have the flexibility to choose their voting methods
  6. Do you think Ranked Choice Voting might be a good option for your community?
    Yes
Franklin Springs Mayor Bruce Scranton ▼
Bruce Scranton
  1. Are you familiar with Ranked Choice Voting, and if so what are your thoughts on that system?
    Yes, it's an interesting, potentially helpful idea. I remember reading about it and thinking that it needs some research before forming an opinion.
  2. Do you think it’s important that the winner of an election receives a majority (>50%) of the votes?
    Yes I do, I think it's not a good thing when you have a winner without a majority voting for them. Several candidates can fracture the votes into so many parts that there is not a clear decision by the voters.
  3. Given that runoffs typically see a substantial dropoff in turnout and cost additional taxpayer money to run, do you think runoffs are the best way to ensure majority winners, or do you think Ranked Choice Voting is a better alternative to achieve that same outcome?
    I think this is a very good reason to investigate Ranked Choice Voting and research how well it would work.
  4. In your experience, what are the main challenges your city faces in conducting elections, particularly regarding runoffs?
    The city conducts elections well. The more important question is the one about runoff participation and how well a runoff reflects the will of the people.
  5. Do you believe local jurisdictions should have more flexibility to choose their voting methods, or should the state maintain uniform standards? What are your reasons?
    I can certainly see the advantage of uniform standards. But just because it is standard, does not mean it is the best. It may be beneficial to have localized tests or experimentation. But I think it needs to lead back to a standard approach to avoid confusion and maintain trust in the system.
  6. Do you think Ranked Choice Voting might be a good option for your community?
    I do see serious drawbacks to a plurality election. I see some issues of efficiency and representation of the will of the people in runoff elections. Right now, we have an incumbent that has 2 people running against him. There's a strong anti-incumbent sentiment, but the 2 running against him will split the anti-incumbent vote. That could easily lead to a different result than the result in a two person race. Plurality voting makes it much harder to remove a highly unsatisfactory incumbent who is facing multiple challengers. Ranked Choice Voting is an idea worth investigating.
Homer City Council Sandra Garrison ▼
Sandra Garrison
  1. Are you familiar with Ranked Choice Voting, and if so what are your thoughts on that system?
    I don't think it would work
  2. Do you think it’s important that the winner of an election receives a majority (>50%) of the votes?
    I do
  3. Given that runoffs typically see a substantial dropoff in turnout and cost additional taxpayer money to run, do you think runoffs are the best way to ensure majority winners, or do you think Ranked Choice Voting is a better alternative to achieve that same outcome?
    It would be nice if there was another option
  4. In your experience, what are the main challenges your city faces in conducting elections, particularly regarding runoffs?
    I don't think there are any challenges when it comes to voting
  5. Do you believe local jurisdictions should have more flexibility to choose their voting methods, or should the state maintain uniform standards? What are your reasons?
    I think uniform standards are important
  6. Do you think Ranked Choice Voting might be a good option for your community?
    No I do not
West Point City Council Joe Downs ▼
Joe Downs
  1. Are you familiar with Ranked Choice Voting, and if so what are your thoughts on that system?
    I am familiar, and I think it's worth considering but the public would need to decide on that matter
  2. Do you think it’s important that the winner of an election receives a majority (>50%) of the votes?
    Each municipality has decided for themselves, I would not worry about interfering with other municipalities
  3. Given that runoffs typically see a substantial dropoff in turnout and cost additional taxpayer money to run, do you think runoffs are the best way to ensure majority winners, or do you think Ranked Choice Voting is a better alternative to achieve that same outcome?
    The only option right now is runoffs, so more voter education is needed to determine if there's another viable option if the community chooses
  4. In your experience, what are the main challenges your city faces in conducting elections, particularly regarding runoffs?
    Currently we use Troup Counties' election system, we've tried with Harris Counties', and the city has occasionally run its own, and this system has been the best so far of those 3.
  5. Do you believe local jurisdictions should have more flexibility to choose their voting methods, or should the state maintain uniform standards? What are your reasons?
    I would be in favor of giving municipalities the option if that's what they choose
  6. Do you think Ranked Choice Voting might be a good option for your community?
    I'm open to that possibility, but we would need to go to the community first and let them decide if this something they might want to pursue
Hoggansville Post 1 Michael Taylor ▼
Michael Taylor
  1. Are you familiar with Ranked Choice Voting, and if so what are your thoughts on that system?
    I think RCV is a good tool to see the candidates, and their position, because of gives them a more informed view on who they are voting for and why.
  2. Do you think it’s important that the winner of an election receives a majority (>50%) of the votes?
    Yes, absolutely, this is very significant, because your vote is voice. In your elected role, you represent the people. This is people's choice, rather than who you know. When you are the people's choice you work for the people.
  3. Given that runoffs typically see a substantial dropoff in turnout and cost additional taxpayer money to run, do you think runoffs are the best way to ensure majority winners, or do you think Ranked Choice Voting is a better alternative to achieve that same outcome?
    People are used to doing traditional runoffs, but RCV could be an alternate. Voters need to be educated about alternatives. As we progress, we can consider RCV.
  4. In your experience, what are the main challenges your city faces in conducting elections, particularly regarding runoffs?
    We haven't had any runoffs in memory. Some of challenges we are facing in our community include, getting people to the polls, making voting more accessible, and getting more voters to participate in elections. People generally vote in Presidential elections rather than city elections.
  5. Do you believe local jurisdictions should have more flexibility to choose their voting methods, or should the state maintain uniform standards? What are your reasons?
    I think we should keep everything uniform and that we should follow state guidelines. That way, if voters move within the state, they will be familiar with the process and would be able adapt. Additionally, State level uniformity ensures the process is done correctly.
  6. Do you think Ranked Choice Voting might be a good option for your community?
    RCV could be a good option for my community. We would need education sessions, which explain what we are doing and what is happening. It's the people's choice. Ranked Choice Voting would allow them to be more flexible in how they choose the candidates.
Atlanta District 11 Reginald Rushin ▼
Reginald Rushin
  1. Are you familiar with Ranked Choice Voting, and if so what are your thoughts on that system?
    I think it's a very useful for voters that have it
  2. Do you think it’s important that the winner of an election receives a majority (>50%) of the votes?
    Yes I think the winner should receive at least 50% of the vote
  3. Given that runoffs typically see a substantial dropoff in turnout and cost additional taxpayer money to run, do you think runoffs are the best way to ensure majority winners, or do you think Ranked Choice Voting is a better alternative to achieve that same outcome?
    I think that if a candidate doesn't receive 50% I am in favor of them using runoffs, the current system is fine with me
  4. In your experience, what are the main challenges your city faces in conducting elections, particularly regarding runoffs?
    I don't think there are enough voter precincts, and that people should be able to vote on Weekends including on Sundays, and generally there should be more options of how to vote
  5. Do you believe local jurisdictions should have more flexibility to choose their voting methods, or should the state maintain uniform standards? What are your reasons?
    I think the State should maintain a uniform system to avoid confusion
  6. Do you think Ranked Choice Voting might be a good option for your community?
    Yes I think it could be with more community imput
Port Wentworth City Council Virginia Hines ▼
Virginia Hines
  1. Are you familiar with Ranked Choice Voting, and if so what are your thoughts on that system?
    I think it would be an interesting experiment. I think you get more of a realistic idea of what people are thinking.
  2. Do you think it’s important that the winner of an election receives a majority (>50%) of the votes?
    No. I think if someone gets 47% that's pretty telling.
  3. Given that runoffs typically see a substantial dropoff in turnout and cost additional taxpayer money to run, do you think runoffs are the best way to ensure majority winners, or do you think Ranked Choice Voting is a better alternative to achieve that same outcome?
    RCV would be a better alternative. I'm devastated that only 6% of voters in Port Wentworth participate in municipal elections. RCV might give people an added incentive to turn out.
  4. In your experience, what are the main challenges your city faces in conducting elections, particularly regarding runoffs?
    Port Wentworth does not run its own elections, they're contracted out to the county. As a former election official, I find that off-putting. Elections should be run by local people, people who the community knows and trusts, who will be there year after year.
  5. Do you believe local jurisdictions should have more flexibility to choose their voting methods, or should the state maintain uniform standards? What are your reasons?
    There should be uniform standards. If our town and the next town over have different rules, that becomes confusing to voters. We live in a mobile society. Someone might live in an apartment in our city and then move to one in the next city. There's already low engagement in elections. Anything that adds confusion might make more people just decide not to bother.
  6. Do you think Ranked Choice Voting might be a good option for your community?
    Yes.
Rincon City Council Tim Milner ▼
Tim Milner
  1. Are you familiar with Ranked Choice Voting, and if so what are your thoughts on that system?
    Great idea, love the concept
  2. Do you think it’s important that the winner of an election receives a majority (>50%) of the votes?
    Yes
  3. Given that runoffs typically see a substantial dropoff in turnout and cost additional taxpayer money to run, do you think runoffs are the best way to ensure majority winners, or do you think Ranked Choice Voting is a better alternative to achieve that same outcome?
    Ranked choice voting is a better, lower cost process
  4. In your experience, what are the main challenges your city faces in conducting elections, particularly regarding runoffs?
    Getting citizens to vote
  5. Do you believe local jurisdictions should have more flexibility to choose their voting methods, or should the state maintain uniform standards? What are your reasons?
    Yes, more flexibility makes sense
  6. Do you think Ranked Choice Voting might be a good option for your community?
    Yes
Emerson City Council Vincent Wiley ▼
Vincent Wiley
  1. Are you familiar with Ranked Choice Voting, and if so what are your thoughts on that system?
    One of the reasons for being in favor of rank choice voting, it gives minorities a fairer and realistic chance to win. It evens the playing field.
  2. Do you think it’s important that the winner of an election receives a majority (>50%) of the votes?
    No
  3. Given that runoffs typically see a substantial dropoff in turnout and cost additional taxpayer money to run, do you think runoffs are the best way to ensure majority winners, or do you think Ranked Choice Voting is a better alternative to achieve that same outcome?
    Rank Choice Voting is the better alternative
  4. In your experience, what are the main challenges your city faces in conducting elections, particularly regarding runoffs?
    It’s an extra cost to the city to hold another election.
  5. Do you believe local jurisdictions should have more flexibility to choose their voting methods, or should the state maintain uniform standards? What are your reasons?
    I think there should be uniformity state wide!
  6. Do you think Ranked Choice Voting might be a good option for your community?
    Yes